How does smart urbanisation contribute to goals of sustainability? Chris Martin, James Evans and I published a paper in Technological Forecasting and Social Change on ‘Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America’. We argue that smart interventions tend to reinforce neoliberal modes of urban development rather than emphasise environmental protection and social equity.
Today, I visited Kista in Greater Stockholm with my Master’s students in Urban Infrastructure to learn about the Urban ICT Arena. Åke Lindström, Petra Adolfsson and Lukas Ljungqvist were kind enough to show us around. Some of my colleagues were even brave enough to ride on the autonomous shuttle!
I am co-organising a paper session at the RGS-IBG annual meeting with James Evans on ‘Projects, Platforms, and the Emergence of Modular Urban Development’. See below for a description of the session and instructions for submitting an abstract.
‘Projects, Platforms, and the Emergence of Modular Urban Development’
Andy Karvonen (KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden)
James Evans (University of Manchester)
There are increasing expectations that cities can catalyse sustainable urban transformations through experimentation and innovation. Funding agencies and local governments are encouraging urban actors to develop, trial and demonstrate digital, financial, ecological and social ‘solutions’ that are discrete, modular, and replicable. Such products can then be upscaled to the city as a whole or easily transferred and replicated in other locales. This entails a new mode of urbanism that is modular and universal rather than situated and particular, suggesting a new landscape of cities that is inherently piecemeal, patchy, and variegated. In this session, we invite theoretical and empirical papers that explore the emerging modularisation of cities, the influence of projects and platforms in the pursuit of sustainable urban development, and the anticipated and real effects of this agenda.
Topics include (but are not limited to):
- Different approaches to modularisation (e.g. social, economic, political, ideological, material)
- Different techniques of modularisation (e.g. best practice, technical solutions, spatial bounding)
- Comparisons between the rhetoric and practice of modularisation
- Replication, upscaling and the lexicon of modularisation
- The practical and ideological tensions between modularisation and sustainability
- Enabling strategies for modularisation
- The relationship between market approaches and modularisation
- The history and present of closed system urban imaginaries (e.g. the capsular city)
Instructions for Authors
Please send proposals (title, 250-word abstract, and author details) to email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org by 31 January 2018.
I was honoured to present some of my research on smart sustainable cities at the 2017 International Symposium on Sustainable Smart Eco-City Planning and Development at Cardiff University on 12 and 13 October. Special thanks to Li Yu and the Cardiff Confucius Institute for organising the event.
It was great to participate in the Exploring Experimental Cities workshop 21-23 September in Copenhagen. Aalborg University in Copenhagen and City Link hosted three days of talks and events that were inspiring and challenging. Special thanks to Peter Munthe-Kaas for pulling it all together. Let’s do it again!
The LSE Review of Books just published a new review of Justin Parkhurst’s The Politics of Evidence: From Evidence-Based Policy to the Good Governance of Evidence (Routledge, 2017). Parkhurst provides a very useful summary of the pros and cons of evidence-based policy and provides a framework for using evidence effectively. This is essential reading for those who are interested in the connections between research and policy. Read more here.